19 Jan The question of one’s legality of your own Rev
1857.
3rd.-Brand new fourth anniversary away from Legal “Crown and you will Anchor” Good.O.F. was actually famous by a dinner at the Brother. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied new chair, and it is actually reported that the brand new Court after that contained 90 people.
The month of january
Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. R. B. Norman, Burton, and J. Bayly ended up being decided to go with brand new people in individuals Collection Committee.
p. 207 The body off a beneficial whale, that was removed on Winterton, was being showed towards Church Ordinary.
New Rev. W. D. Go, the newest minister off St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before you leave Southsea, come presented with a bag out-of ?61.
21st.-New “Sisters” is in accident which have one of several stone piers out of the fresh Connection, that it got considerably busted.
Feb. 4th.-An Anti-Tax meeting was actually held at City Hallway. The brand new Gran presided, while the pursuing the participated https://getbride.org/kuumat-malesialaiset-naiset/ in what is going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer looked like the brand new mover inside amount.
Feb. 21st.-Good “Poor’s Rates” appointment had been kept from the Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may an answer protesting resistant to the 1s. 6d. every quarter rate are followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you may F. Starling talked about the subject, due to the fact run of the Guardians are defended of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among Panel.
Feb. 25th.-A case and this delighted considerable appeal, was read from the State Legal, Tolhouse-hall, until the Legal (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The brand new plaintiff is actually Mr. John Cobb, fabric seller, getting who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin appeared; the fresh new defendants had been Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and Grams. D. Palmer, who were illustrated because of the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The fresh new plaintiff reported that he had been an applicant toward office away from Councillor towards age for example in the solicitation away from Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you will Grams. D. Palmer. During the time he turned a candidate the guy decidedly advised them which he won’t spend from his own pouch alot more than just ?ten to the expenses of election, and it is know the Liberal team, that the guy belonged, carry out signup the others. The evening before election he obtained a quotation of what the expenses was more likely, plus outcome of which he simultaneously noticed each other Mr. Burroughs and you will Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to guess, the guy experienced, amounted in order to regarding ?45, given that memberships altogether amounted so you’re able to but ?42. Once certain discussion it accessible to hold him simple of your amount of the expenses which could go beyond the sum of the authorized, and he and you can Mr. Burroughs after that went p. 208 towards the Committee-space of your own North-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs said they’d produced plans for their friend John Cobb winning the market-ward. The expense of the election, that he (this new plaintiff) destroyed, amounted altogether to help you ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, thus, that he today said from the defendants try ?16 1s. 7d.-The new plaintiff, into the get across-test by the Mr. Cufaude, accepted you to definitely ?39 of entire matter is actually to possess – -.-Mr. Cufaude contended if, since plaintiff stated, the new defendants got provided him a promise to your extra expenses, brand new be sure must come into composing. And, incase evidence is real, and this, yet not, the guy debated, it actually was hopeless on the plaintiff to recuperate, inasmuch as he himself had greet you to a large part out-of the entire costs is actually getting – -, that was an illegal operate.-Mr. Chamberlin argued that the plaintiff, just after researching the brand new guarantee from the defendants, acted only up on brand new trust of that promise, hence for this reason, as they had entered upon an involvement to expend the money, they were responsible. The cash, furthermore, had not been spent of the plaintiff, however, from the panel appointed in order to perform this new election, and you will until the election is more, the newest plaintiff was not aware the currency got already been spent when you look at the – -.-Their Honour said it absolutely was obvious the new guarantee have to have already been on paper. He had been of view, also, that the plaintiff wasn’t bound to spend the money for illegal charges, and therefore he could not give his step for cash he advertised.-The plaintiff is actually, properly, non-suited.
No Comments